Monist call for papers on cosmopolitanism

For, of course. More here.

94:4 October 2011
Cosmopolitanism: For and Against
Deadline for Submissions: October 31, 2010
Advisory Editor: Gillian Brock, The University of Auckland (g.brock@auckland.ac.nz)

According to cosmopolitanism, every person has global stature as the ultimate unit of moral concern and is therefore entitled to equal respect and consideration no matter what her citizenship status or other affiliations happen to be. This issue of The Monist is intended as a forum for debates about the pros and cons of cosmopolitanism. It will address questions such as: What does cosmopolitanism require by way of obligations of justice to all? What kinds of reforms to our global and local institutions do cosmopolitan concerns require? Are these requirements feasible? In addition to our obligations to everyone, do we have further, more demanding, obligations to compatriots or to family members? Do non-cosmopolitan theories provide a better account of our obligations and allow us a more useful framework for mediating the interests of compatriots and non-compatriots?

Share

Leave a Comment